LiveJournal Entry.
First, tried to get a game of Cranium Rats going today, still no luck. Fate is conspiring against your faithful writer, who will keep fighting back, and will eventually win.
So, we keep talking about CSI Games, but we do not yet have a clear definition of what comprises a CSI Game. What we do have right now is what I said in my first post on the topic. To whit:
".."CSI Games", CSI being Competitive Story Interaction. These are RPGs("What is an RPG?" is a question I will leave unanswered for now, hoping you know what I mean) where there is a story being generated, but the social interaction is competitive and even antagonistic in nature, rather than the "Cooperative" mode suggested and propagated throughout our hobby's history. In a way, this is us going back to Board/War games, from which our hobby draws much of its history. I'd say that we're growing in the opposite direction, rather than regressing.
What is Chainmail, Dungeon and Dragon's Proto-form if not a Wargame to which one adds little acting? So CSI Games are in a very real way RPGs to which you add a Wargame mentality!"
So we'll start with that as an introduction and continue to construct a definition, one that hopefully could be used as is, or as a basis in game-book introductions.
CSI Games.
C is for Competitive/Cooperative.
Most games under the umbrella of "Role-Playing Games"(RPGs) till now had been Cooperative in nature, the social interaction between players, players and Game Master(GM) and that of between player-characters had been Cooperative. This is the origin of or originated from the "party". We're all in this together.
This may also be a leading cause into the "You don't win in RPGs" when explaining what you're doing to an elder party member.
The other side of the coin is that which I am putting up as the main identifier of CSI Games, the Competitive side. Competition is something inherent to human interaction, inherent to the act of gaming. You find competition in Board, War and Card games, along in most sports(where you have competition between groups and cooperation inside them). I want the players to compete, whether for spotlight, victory, control, in-game resources, whatever. There need be a competitive element somewhere in the game.
It should be reflected in the mechanics as well, but that comes second.
S is for Story.
We're here to tell a story, to hear a story or experience one's wake. We're not here to merely roll the dice or shuffle the cards. Unlike board-games and card-games, we have a story unfolding here. If we don't, we're dealing with something else.
Story often goes with Cooperative. The story-building part is a joint effort by all participants.
I is for Interaction/Isolation.
We're playing a game with other people, you interact with them. You want to help them stop that other guy from winning, you're talking to them and trying to stop them, that's also interaction! You do not play in a void, you're playing with people, interact with them.
Mechanics should have some way to represent and encourage interaction between the players.
Isolation has little place in this scheme, it's mostly there as the other side of Interaction, where you're "Snubbed" for game reasons, as others ally against you. Alternately, if you're snubbed for out-of-game reasons, you're unlikely to do well in game, or have fun.
Game is self-explanatory.
This is a game, it has winners. This is a game, it has rules. This is a game, it is an activity you do for fun. This is a game, one of the basic human activities, and you know one when you see it.
So we are left with CSI Game, or Competitive(/Cooperative) Story Interaction Games.
Isolation plays little part in this, and is mostly there as something to be avoided.
Competitive is what sets this apart from other games, so we're paying it more heed. Cooperative is also there, but more as part of the Story or Interaction bits and less as an individual agent.
This is what a CSI Game is, if you disagree with me, or think of a better name or definition, this is the place to argue so.
If you think "CSI" is Geeky, this is where you get to voice your piece.
07 May, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I've expressed my opinions concerning the CSI acronym through private e-mails to Guy, but figured I might as well make those comments public here.
Essentially, I like the idea of a CSI game category. I'm just not too fond of the "CSI" acronym itself. To speak "CSI", you pretty much have to spell it out loud. IMO, the acronym needs to be easily pronouncable. Preferably, it should also evoke something of the competitive aspect we're trying to convey. For example: Rival Interactive Story Creation (RISC) Game.
Hm, we could use Sic, just like in [Sic] or "Sic the Game at him!"
I don't know how wise it'd be to use something which can be confused with an actual game! Keep making suggestions, anyone who has an opinion for or against these suggestions, voice them!
Also, we pretty much know it's not that important if you need to voice it as a word or as an acronym: RPG, TCG, CIA, FBI, etc. People use such acronyms all the time, especially in our hobby and the allied ones.
How about "ICS Game", which can be said as "X Game"?
I'm leaning towards "[sic] game". The internet had propagated the term [sic], also, Story Interaction Competitive Game. Story and Interaction are a couplet and Competitive Game the other, which makes sense to have those two terms adjuscent.
Thoughts?
Post a Comment